Security Vulnerability of the Week 09/05/22

Weekly review of the top vulnerability issues of the week

This week there were mostly updates on existing flaws – Qnap, F5 discloses vulnerabilities,

This week features Raspberry Robin a windows malware work attacking QNAP, QNAP releasing bugfixes, F5 releasing Bugfixes, Github with more stringent controls on authentication


Appsec

NPM NPMJS with new CDN

The open-source project SheetJS aka XLSX has dropped support for NPM

The library was downloaded about 1.4 million times

The project’s maintainer suggests that the decision to pull out of the npm registry is based on the newly introduced two-factor requirements for top projects, GitHub’s abrupt decision-making, and ongoing ‘legal matters’ between SheetJS and npm

For the lates change on the CDN: https://github.com/SheetJS/sheetjs/commit/ed18acd63d7a5cd31527a36a9af54542cdfcfd30#diff-b335630551682c19a781afebcf4d07bf978fb1f8ac04c6bf87428ed5106870f5R219

The developer behind SheetJS quotes mostly the move of the 2FA

sheetjs enrolled in 2fa by npm
SheetJS’ developer now required to set up 2FA by npm (GitHub)

GitHub’s (see below) is actively enforcing the move to MFA (2 factor authentication) after recent incidents and previous year’s hijacking incidents that hit famous npm packages like ua-parser-jscoa and rc.

Github

Following last week’s announcement, Github is tightening security rules and posture

GitHub announced on 4/5/2022 that all users who contribute code on its platform (an estimated 83 million developers in total) will be required to enable two-factor authentication (2FA) on their accounts by the end of 2023.

Also to force stronger authentication due to recent issues with SMS based tokens: GitHub urges switching to security keys or TOTPs since threat actors can bypass or steal SMS 2FA auth tokens.

The actions come after the recently discovered breach. The organization continues to issue the following advice despite the fact that very little user base was affected

  • Review all your private repositories for secrets or credentials stored in them. There are several tools that can help with this task, such as GitHub secret scanning and trufflehog.
  • Review the OAuth applications that you’ve authorized for your personal account or that are authorized to access your organization and remove anything that’s no longer needed.
  • Follow GitHub’s guidelines for hardening the security posture of your GitHub organization.
  • Review your account activity, personal access tokens, OAuth apps, and SSH keys for any activity or changes that may have come from the attacker.
  • Additional questions should be directed to GitHub Support.
  • Review all your private repositories for secrets or credentials stored in them. There are several tools that can help with this task, such as GitHub secret scanning and trufflehog.
  • Review the OAuth applications that you’ve authorized for your personal account or that are authorized to access your organization and remove anything that’s no longer needed.
  • Follow GitHub’s guidelines for hardening the security posture of your GitHub organization.
  • Review your account activity, personal access tokens, OAuth apps, and SSH keys for any activity or changes that may have come from the attacker.
  • Additional questions should be directed to GitHub Support.

For the Full report on Git: https://phoenix.security/security-vulnerability-of-the-week-02-04-22/


INFRA/Network

Windows – Raspberry Robin Vulnerability

Raspberry Robin

A new Windows malware with worm-like affects Windows targeting QNAP. the malware has worm-like capabilities is propagated by means of removable USB devices.

Attack chains pertaining to Raspberry Robin start with connecting an infected USB drive to a Windows machine. Present within the device is the worm payload, which appears as a .LNK shortcut file to a legitimate folder.

Raspberry Robin

The worm then takes care of spawning a new process using cmd.exe to read and execute a malicious file stored on the external drive.

To monitor attacks: Raspberry Robin detections so far is the presence of outbound C2 contact involving the processes regsvr32.exe, rundll32.exe, and dllhost.exe to IP addresses associated with Tor nodes.

For more info: https://thehackernews.com/2022/05/researchers-warn-of-raspberry-robin.html

QNAP

Tracked as CVE-2022-27588 (CVSS score: 9.8), the vulnerability has been addressed in QVR 5.1.6 build 20220401 and later. 

 CVE-2022-23121 and other were discovered by NCC Group EDG team at Pwn2Own

“A vulnerability has been reported to affect QNAP VS Series NVR running QVR,” QNAP said in an advisory. “If exploited, this vulnerability allows remote attackers to run arbitrary commands.”

The following Vulnerabilities were discovered

NCC Group’s EDG team members exploited one of these security flaws, tracked as CVE-2022-23121 and rated with a 9.8/10 severity score

Three of the other bugs QNAP warned its customers about also received 9.8/10 severity ratings (i.e., CVE-2022-23125CVE-2022-23122CVE-2022-0194)

  • QTS 5.0.x and later
  • QTS 4.5.4 and later
  • QTS 4.3.6 and later
  • QTS 4.3.4 and later
  • QTS 4.3.3 and later
  • QTS 4.2.6 and later
  • QuTS hero h5.0.x and later
  • QuTS hero h4.5.4 and later
  • QuTScloud c5.0.x

F5

BIG-IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

F5 on Wednesday released patches to contain 43 bugs spanning its products.

 43 issues addressed, one is rated Critical, 17 are rated High, 24 are rated Medium, and one is rated low in severity.

Most notable vulnerability: CVE-2022-1388 with CVSS 9.8 and internal assessment Critical due to the front-facing and lack of authentication checks potentially allowing attacker to remotely execute code and attack affected system

“This vulnerability may allow an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the BIG-IP system through the management port and/or self IP addresses to execute arbitrary system commands, create or delete files, or disable services,” 

Affected Products: Big IP with the following version

  • 16.1.0 – 16.1.2
  • 15.1.0 – 15.1.5
  • 14.1.0 – 14.1.4
  • 13.1.0 – 13.1.4
  • 12.1.0 – 12.1.6
  • 11.6.1 – 11.6.5
  • 16.1.0 – 16.1.2
  • 15.1.0 – 15.1.5
  • 14.1.0 – 14.1.4
  • 13.1.0 – 13.1.4
  • 12.1.0 – 12.1.6
  • 11.6.1 – 11.6.5

Trend

Trend Micro

Trend Micro antivirus has fixed a false positive affecting its Apex One endpoint security solution that caused Microsoft Edge updates to be tagged as malware and the Windows registry to be incorrectly modified.

the false positive has been raised to multiple forums and social media

As users further revealed, the Trend Micro Apex One flagged the browser updates as Virus/Malware: TROJ_FRS.VSNTE222 and Virus/Malware: TSC_GENCLEAN.

For the full news refer to:

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/trend-micro-antivirus-modified-windows-registry-by-mistake-how-to-fix/

Cloud

Heroku

Heroku platform owned by Salesforce has performed a round of forced password resets in response to a security incident from last month.

“As part of our efforts to enhance our security and in response to an incident published on status.heroku.com, we wanted to inform you that we will begin resetting user account passwords on May 4, 2022,” read the email sent to Heroku customers.

The breach was linked to a recent breach of Github repositories and the attacker leveraging the exposed credentials.

from Hacker News reader “There was certainly a breach three weeks ago that they seem to have been investigating since. I am, like the commenter above, not filled with confidence about their statement, mostly because of the total lack of transparency so far”

We covered Github breach: https://phoenix.security/vulnerability-weekly/?playlist=728882e&video=1e6673c

The latest incident report from Heroku: https://status.heroku.com/incidents/2413

Google Docs crashes

A recent bug discovered on May 6 in Google Docs is causing it to crash when a series of words are typed into a document opened with the online word processor.

A Google Docs user, Pat Needham brought up the issue on Google Docs Editors Help forum.

Google Docs crashes at the sight of “And. And. And. And. And.” when the “Show grammar suggestion” is turned on.

“It’s case-sensitive. So trying with ‘and. and. And. and. And.’ doesn’t cause it to crash.”

The bug has been resolved: May 6th, 2022 04:56 AM ET:BleepingComputer where the first news was reported was no longer able to reproduce the bug. We continue to await an official response from Google on the matter.

Current Year Research on Vulnerabilities Discovered

No alternative text description for this image
Courtesy of Christoper Parisel

For the Deep dive on previous Cloud Vulnerabilities: https://phoenix.security/security-vulnerability-of-the-week-02-04-22/

Hotpatch of AWS Log4J

CVE IDs: CVE-2021-3100, CVE-2021-3101, CVE-2022-0070, CVE-2022-0071

Amazon as per December released several version of AMI with patched version of Log4J.

Security Researchers from palo alto have disclosed Security researchers recently reported issues within the hotpatch released in December, and the associated OCI hooks for Bottlerocket (“Hotdog”). We have addressed these issues within a new version of the hotpatch, and a new version of Hotdog.

The latest package names and versions of the hotpatch for Amazon Linux and Amazon Linux 2 are as follows:

  • Amazon Linux: log4j-cve-2021-44228-hotpatch-1.1-16.amzn1
  • Amazon Linux 2: log4j-cve-2021-44228-hotpatch-1.1-16.amzn2

Full Post: https://aws.amazon.com/security/security-bulletins/AWS-2022-006/

Superglue – Orca –

Working with AWS DataBrew: 3 Easy Steps - Learn | Hevo

Orca Security team did discover on Jan 2022 a critical security issue in the AWS Glue service that could allow an actor to create resources and access data of other AWS Glue customers. 

AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that makes it easy to discover, prepare, and combine data for analytics, machine learning, and application development. During our research, we were able to identify a feature in AWS Glue that could be exploited to obtain credentials to a role within the AWS service’s own account, which provided us full access to the internal service API.

Bulletin: https://aws.amazon.com/security/security-bulletins/AWS-2022-002/

the orca security team were able to

  1. Assume roles in AWS customer accounts that are trusted by the Glue service. In every account that uses Glue, there’s at least one role of this kind.
  2. Query and modify AWS Glue service-related resources in a region. This includes but is not limited to metadata for: Glue jobs, dev endpoints, workflows, crawlers and triggers.

For more info: https://orca.security/resources/blog/aws-glue-vulnerability

sagemaker – Lightspin – CVSS 7.4

RDS Postress SQL – Lightspin – CVSS 6.3

AutoWrap – Orca – CVSS 8.5

logicApp – NetSPI – CVSS 6

credManifest – NetSPI – CVSS 6.5 – CVE 2021-42306

extraReplica – Wiz – CVSS 6.8

Bonus

XBOX Live Down

For all the gamers on May 6th Microsoft says the Xbox Live services were currently down in a major outage, impacting customers worldwide and preventing them from launching or buying games.

The service was down for two and more hours according to https://downdetector.com/status/xbox-live/

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/technology/xbox-is-down-worldwide-with-users-unable-to-play-games/

Francesco is an internationally renowned public speaker, with multiple interviews in high-profile publications (eg. Forbes), and an author of numerous books and articles, who utilises his platform to evangelize the importance of Cloud security and cutting-edge technologies on a global scale.

Discuss this blog with our community on Slack

Join our AppSec Phoenix community on Slack to discuss this blog and other news with our professional security team

From our Blog

We don’t need more tools. We need a new way of thinking. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) promises the world, but most teams crumble under tool sprawl, silos, and endless ticket queues. That’s why I built IronClad™ — a brutally simple, brutally effective operating model that fuses ASPM with decentralized ownership and ruthless clarity. This isn’t theory. It’s how security teams can actually win: small empowered squads, zero ambiguity, and mission-first remediation. If you’re tired of drowning in dashboards and ready to rethink how your teams build, secure, and scale, this is the blueprint. 👉 Read how ASPM + IronClad™ flips the script on vulnerability management.
Phil Moroni
As cyber threats become increasingly sophisticated, the need for a more proactive and comprehensive approach to vulnerability management is undeniable. A threat-centric methodology, when combined with advanced tools like Agentic AI and Application Security Posture Management (ASPM), offers organizations the ability to predict and mitigate vulnerabilities before they are exploited by threat actors. This article delves into how leveraging threat intelligence, exposure and reachability analysis, and contextual risk assessments can help organizations stay ahead of cyber threats, specifically focusing on high-risk vulnerabilities like remote code execution (RCE) and memory corruption. Through case studies like Citrix ADC and MOVEit Transfer, the article highlights the growing trend of zero-day exploits and emphasizes the importance of a proactive, data-driven security strategy. In a world where vulnerabilities are constantly targeted, adopting a threat-centric approach is not just a best practice—it’s essential to ensuring long-term security. For startups, the focus is clear—establish visibility and ensure core security practices are in place. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) tools provide a straightforward, automated approach to detecting vulnerabilities and enforcing policies. These solutions help reduce risk quickly without overburdening small security teams. Mature organizations, on the other hand, are tackling a different set of problems. With the sheer number of vulnerabilities and an increasingly complicated threat landscape, enterprises need to fine-tune their approach. The goal shifts toward intelligent remediation, leveraging real-time threat intelligence and advanced risk prioritization. ASPM tools at this stage do more than just detect vulnerabilities—they provide context, enable proactive decision-making, and streamline the entire remediation process. The emergence of AI-assisted code generation has further complicated security in both environments. These tools, while speeding up development, are often responsible for introducing new vulnerabilities into applications at a faster pace than traditional methods. The challenge is clear: AI-generated code can hide flaws that are difficult to catch in the rush of innovation. Both startups and enterprises need to adjust their security posture to account for these new risks. ASPM platforms, like Phoenix Security, provide automated scanning of code before it hits production, ensuring that flaws don’t make it past the first line of defense. Meanwhile, organizations are also grappling with the backlog crisis in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). A staggering number of CVEs remain unprocessed, leaving many businesses with limited data on which to base their patching decisions. While these delays leave companies vulnerable, Phoenix Security steps in by cross-referencing CVE data with known exploits and live threat intelligence, helping organizations stay ahead despite the lag in official vulnerability reporting. Whether just starting their security program or managing a complex infrastructure, organizations need a toolset that adapts with them. Phoenix Security enables businesses of any size to prioritize vulnerabilities based on actual risk, not just theoretical impact, helping security teams navigate the evolving threat landscape with speed and accuracy.
Francesco Cipollone
The journey of securing an organization’s application landscape varies dramatically, depending on where a company stands in its maturity. Early-stage startups with small security teams face challenges not only with vulnerabilities but also with scaling their security processes in line with their growth. On the flip side, established enterprises struggle with managing complex environments, prioritizing remediation, and dealing with vast amounts of vulnerabilities while staying ahead of sophisticated threats. For startups, the focus is clear—establish visibility and ensure core security practices are in place. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) tools provide a straightforward, automated approach to detecting vulnerabilities and enforcing policies. These solutions help reduce risk quickly without overburdening small security teams. Mature organizations, on the other hand, are tackling a different set of problems. With the sheer number of vulnerabilities and an increasingly complicated threat landscape, enterprises need to fine-tune their approach. The goal shifts toward intelligent remediation, leveraging real-time threat intelligence and advanced risk prioritization. ASPM tools at this stage do more than just detect vulnerabilities—they provide context, enable proactive decision-making, and streamline the entire remediation process. The emergence of AI-assisted code generation has further complicated security in both environments. These tools, while speeding up development, are often responsible for introducing new vulnerabilities into applications at a faster pace than traditional methods. The challenge is clear: AI-generated code can hide flaws that are difficult to catch in the rush of innovation. Both startups and enterprises need to adjust their security posture to account for these new risks. ASPM platforms, like Phoenix Security, provide automated scanning of code before it hits production, ensuring that flaws don’t make it past the first line of defense. Meanwhile, organizations are also grappling with the backlog crisis in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). A staggering number of CVEs remain unprocessed, leaving many businesses with limited data on which to base their patching decisions. While these delays leave companies vulnerable, Phoenix Security steps in by cross-referencing CVE data with known exploits and live threat intelligence, helping organizations stay ahead despite the lag in official vulnerability reporting. Whether just starting their security program or managing a complex infrastructure, organizations need a toolset that adapts with them. Phoenix Security enables businesses of any size to prioritize vulnerabilities based on actual risk, not just theoretical impact, helping security teams navigate the evolving threat landscape with speed and accuracy.
Francesco Cipollone
The cybersecurity world is reeling as MITRE’s funding for the CVE and NVD systems expires, disrupting the backbone of global vulnerability management. As traditional sources like the National Vulnerability Database collapse under funding cuts and submission backlogs, security teams face delays, incomplete data, and loss of automation in remediation pipelines. This isn’t just a data problem—it’s a structural crisis for application security and vulnerability correlation. In this landscape of uncertainty, Phoenix Security’s ASPM platform steps up with a code-to-cloud correlation engine that doesn’t depend on outdated data workflows. By connecting code-level insights (including tools like Semgrep) to runtime and cloud environments, Phoenix enables faster, context-aware vulnerability remediation—even as NVD and CVE pipelines deteriorate. This article dives into the implications of the CVE shutdown and how Phoenix Security is helping security and development teams transition to a resilient, correlation-first approach to cybersecurity.
Francesco Cipollone
Learn how to predict ransomware risks and vulnerability exploitation using a threat-centric approach. Explore data-driven insights, verified exploit trends, and methods for assessing the likelihood of attacks with key references to CISA KEV, EPSS, and Phoenix Security’s 4D Risk Formula.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
Derek

Derek Fisher

Head of product security at a global fintech

Derek Fisher – Head of product security at a global fintech. Speaker, instructor, and author in application security.

Derek is an award winning author of a children’s book series in cybersecurity as well as the author of “The Application Security Handbook.” He is a university instructor at Temple University where he teaches software development security to undergraduate and graduate students. He is a speaker on topics in the cybersecurity space and has led teams, large and small, at organizations in the healthcare and financial industries. He has built and matured information security teams as well as implemented organizational information security strategies to reduce the organizations risk.

Derek got his start in the hardware engineering space where he learned about designing circuits and building assemblies for commercial and military applications. He later pursued a computer science degree in order to advance a career in software development. This is where Derek was introduced to cybersecurity and soon caught the bug. He found a mentor to help him grow in cybersecurity and then pursued a graduate degree in the subject.

Since then Derek has worked in the product security space as an architect and leader. He has led teams to deliver more secure software in organizations from multiple industries. His focus has been to raise the security awareness of the engineering organization while maintaining a practice of secure code development, delivery, and operations.

In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

Jeevan Singh

Jeevan Singh

Founder of Manicode Security

Jeevan Singh is the Director of Security Engineering at Rippling, with a background spanning various Engineering and Security leadership roles over the course of his career. He’s dedicated to the integration of security practices into software development, working to create a security-aware culture within organizations and imparting security best practices to the team.
In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

James

James Berthoty

Founder of Latio Tech

James Berthoty has over ten years of experience across product and security domains. He founded Latio Tech to help companies find the right security tools for their needs without vendor bias.

christophe

Christophe Parisel

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Chris

Chris Romeo

Co-Founder
Security Journey

Chris Romeo is a leading voice and thinker in application security, threat modeling, and security champions and the CEO of Devici and General Partner at Kerr Ventures. Chris hosts the award-winning “Application Security Podcast,” “The Security Table,” and “The Threat Modeling Podcast” and is a highly rated industry speaker and trainer, featured at the RSA Conference, the AppSec Village @ DefCon, OWASP Global AppSec, ISC2 Security Congress, InfoSec World and All Day DevOps. Chris founded Security Journey, a security education company, leading to an exit in 2022. Chris was the Chief Security Advocate at Cisco, spreading security knowledge through education and champion programs. Chris has twenty-six years of security experience, holding positions across the gamut, including application security, security engineering, incident response, and various Executive roles. Chris holds the CISSP and CSSLP certifications.

jim

Jim Manico

Founder of Manicode Security

Jim Manico is the founder of Manicode Security, where he trains software developers on secure coding and security engineering. Jim is also the founder of Brakeman Security, Inc. and an investor/advisor for Signal Sciences. He is the author of Iron-Clad Java: Building Secure Web Applications (McGraw-Hill), a frequent speaker on secure software practices, and a member of the JavaOne Rockstar speaker community. Jim is also a volunteer for and former board member of the OWASP foundation.

Join our Mailing list!

Get all the latest news, exclusive deals, and feature updates.

The IKIGAI concept
x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
ShieldPRO